In the new era of software development, simply using AI tools isn’t enough. Without a clear methodology, we risk creating chaos faster than ever before. True efficiency comes from a disciplined, architectural approach where the human guides and the AI executes.

This is the playbook for that process – a practical guide for the modern systems architect, framed as the training protocol for the next generation of space explorers.

Phase 1: The Simulator Blueprint

Before any astronaut trains for a lunar mission, the flight directors and engineers must first design the simulator itself. Every scenario, every system, every potential failure must be architected before a trainee even steps into the cockpit. This is the Blueprint Phase – the most critical part of the entire operation, where we think, then act.

The process is methodical:

• Mission Visualization: First, the entire mission is visualized. We create the architectural plan, defining all systems and their interactions. For this, tools like Mermaid are invaluable for creating the clear, version-controlled schematics that serve as our master plan.
• Staging the Environment: Once the plan is solid, we prepare the “training facility” – the project’s directory structure. We create all the necessary files and folders, laying out a clean and logical foundation for the simulation’s code.
• Issuing the Directives: Inside this empty structure, we write strategic docstrings. These are not just comments; they are the mission parameters and operational objectives for both ourselves and our AI assistants. They define the purpose and responsibility of each module before implementation begins.

This is the process that separates reactive coding from deliberate engineering.

Phase 2: Assembling Your AI Training Staff

A modern flight simulator doesn’t run on its own; it’s managed by a sophisticated staff. To maximize efficiency, we must assign clear roles to our AI assistants, reflecting a strict separation of concerns.

• The Strategic AI (The Mission Planner LLMs – e.g., Google Gemini, ChatGPT ..): I use this AI for high-level, architectural tasks. Think of it as the lead engineer who helps design the entire training program. Based on my vision, it generates the complete, empty, but fully documented project skeleton. It helps flesh out the initial blueprint and strategic documentation (e.g. README.md, high-level docstrings). Its role is planning and structure. Here is where I dream, create and evolve the bigger picture. 
• The Tactical AI (The Cockpit Instructor – e.g., GitHub Copilot): This is my on-the-ground implementation assistant. Working inside my IDE, it’s the instructor sitting next to the trainee. It takes my specific, short commands (in the form of comments like # Initiate pre-flight check) and generates the actual code to execute that maneuver. Its role is execution and real-time assistance. This is my workbench where I can focus on details and “get job done”.

If the simulation reveals a major flaw in the mission plan, I return to my Strategic AI to discuss adjustments to the overall architectural blueprint.

Understanding Your Cockpit Instructor’s Intel

To get the most out of your Tactical AI (IDE plugin), you must understand how it gathers intelligence (context). It’s not magic; it’s an operative with three layers of awareness within the simulator:

• 1. The Active Control Panel (The Active File): This is its most critical source of information. The AI analyzes everything on the screen you’re currently working on: the code above and below your cursor, import statements, class and function definitions, and—most importantly—your docstrings and comments.
• 2. Adjacent Systems (Open Tabs): The AI maintains a short-term memory of other control panels you have open. It correctly assumes that if life_support.py, navigation.py, and comms.py are open simultaneously, they are part of the same system and will use context from all of them.
• 3. The Full Spacecraft Schematic (The Entire Project): This is where it gets powerful. The AI intelligently maps your entire project directory, following import statements and function calls to find relevant definitions. High-level documents like README.md or the main docstring in app/__init__.py serve as its “mission briefing,” giving it the strategic overview it needs to make better tactical suggestions.

In short: prepare your project as if you were onboarding a new flight engineer. The clearer your documentation and structure, the more intelligently your AI assistant will perform.

The Build Sequence: Constructing the Simulator

How do we actually build our app? We can’t start our mission simulator with the flashy graphics on the main viewscreen. We must begin with the core physics engine and the data models that define the spacecraft itself. This requires a bottom-up approach (from data to “application factory”) followed by a lateral movement (between modules) to ensure a stable and logical foundation.

Here is a battle-tested sequence for building a web application simulator (in Flask):

• Step 1: The Core Components (Data Models & Extensions) We start down at the bottom by defining the fundamental components of our simulated world. In app/models.py, we define our data structures (e.g., the CrewMember and MissionLog classes). In app/extensions.py, we initialize our core tools (e.g. SQLAlchemy for the databank, Bcrypt for security protocols). Data is the foundation of everything; defining it first prevents countless future system failures.
• Step 2: The Mainframe Assembly (Application Factory) Next, we move upward to app/__init__.py. Here, we write the create_app() function, which acts as the main assembly line. It imports the core components, connects them to the application mainframe, and registers the (still empty) command modules (Blueprints). This assembles the complete, functional skeleton of our simulator.
• Step 3: Support Systems (Functional Modules: e.g. Authentication) With the mainframe ready, we can start moving laterally – we build the first complete, testable “slice” of functionality: e.g. the crew authentication system. We focus entirely on the app/auth/ directory, creating the forms, templates, and route logic for registration and login. This provides a crucial early win and a secure foundation for all subsequent modules. After we finish the first module – continue with the next one.
• Step 4: Executing the Core Mission (Main Application Logic) Now that our crew has all the systems (modules) ready, we can build the core mission functionality in the app/main/ directory. We write the logic for all the primary operations, building upon the secure and functional foundation established in the previous step.
• Step 5: Systems Integration & Refinement (Templates) As a final step, we “clean up” and polish the cockpit. Now that we have multiple functional viewscreens, we can identify common elements and refactor them into a base.html template. This ensures a consistent user interface and makes future modifications vastly more efficient.

This T-shape strategy – going bottom-up (from data to app assembly) first combined with lateral (module-by-module) approach  afterwards is a logical and stable methodology for architecting robust systems with an AI assistant, ensuring your final spacecraft is mission-ready.

Conclusion: The Architect’s Mandate

This playbook is more than just a set of instructions; it’s a new operational doctrine. It defines a strategic shift where the developer’s primary value is no longer in the manual labor of implementation, but in the intellectual rigor of architecture, system design, and quality assurance. The AI is a powerful engine, but the human is the mission director – the one who charts the course, understands the objective, and bears the ultimate responsibility for success.

—

This methodology isn’t about working less; it’s about working on what truly matters. Welcome to Mission Control.

 Look at the project (on GitHub):

• Python (Prototype) Project: https://github.com/GeorgeFreedomTech/Terminal-Commander

• Flask (Web App) Project: https://github.com/GeorgeFreedomTech/Flask-Mission-Control

• Streamlit (Visualization) Project: ..in progress..